Countless
sports like hockey, badminton, volleyball, rugby and athletics have stringent
methods of dealing with misconduct or violence of any kind on the field.
What about cricket? Players are mainly
fined an insignificant amount of their match fee and banned for a match at
best, while the match during which the misdeeds are carried is totally ignored.
The recent brawl in a domestic cricket match in Bermuda where the wicketkeeper
resorted to violent means may be an anomaly, but there are various other
instances of misbehaviour among players and umpires was recorded.
Ben Stokes recently had an argument with
Indian captain Virat Kohli, while the Anderson-Jadeja incident is still fresh
in our minds. The Australian cricketers tend to go overboard with their
sledging on regular occasions who can forget the Monkey Gate and Josh Hazelwood
saying, “who the f**k is the third umpire”.
At a recent MCC meeting, perhaps this issue as
discussed at large, with the members contemplating an introduction to “penalty
cards” in cricket too. These would give umpires the power to send players
off the field for grievous disciplinary violations. The MCC world cricket
committee has recently recommended that umpires be empowered “to eject
cricketers from a game for serious disciplinary breaches” such as threatening
an umpire, physically assaulting another player, umpire, official or spectator,
and any other act of violence on the field.
The committee further went on
to state that cricket was the only sport in which there is “no
in-match punishment”. Rightly so too, as the players are reprimanded after
a match ends, the one who creates nuisance during a game might easily go
on to win the match for his side. Incidents such as the under-arm bowling
incident could also be avoided.
Billy Bowden, albeit jokingly, also showed
Glen McCgrath the red card in an attempt to discourage his from under arm
bowling. That certain gesture had worked too. If the MCC does decide to work on
this problem, the forms of penalty or penalty cards may be valid from as early
as October 2017. This would mean that cricketers would have to be on their toes
and keep their behaviour in check especially while fielding.
Unlike football, where a sending off still
maintains some level of competition, cricket would be virtually impossible for
a team with a batsman or bowler short against a full strength opposition.
Having stated that, it is unfair for the
opposition to bear the brunt of a player who has not adhered to the spirit of
the game. Virat Kohli ended up making 248 runs in the secondTest against
England, clearly being the difference between the two sides, despite discipline
problems, especially with Ben Stokes.
Very recently Stokes was also in the headlines
for refusing to shake hands with Bangladeshi players during the ODIs and yet
played a defining role in England’s first Test win. These may be recent
examples but what about the Ashes sledging incident of 2013 (James Anderson vs
Michael Clarke), or the Harbhajan- Sreesanth controversy in the IPL 2008?
The introduction of
cards may perhaps decrease the role of troublemakers in a certain match- for
example, restrict the number of overs a bowler is allowed to bowl or settle the
batting position for a key batsman. Whatever be the impact, this move by the
MCC will have strong ramifications and will alter the way this game is played.
No comments:
Post a Comment